<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are phone numbers relevant?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techgenial.com/2007/06/are-phone-numbers-relevant.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techgenial.com/2007/06/are-phone-numbers-relevant.html</link>
	<description>Tech News, Social Media, Entrepreneurship</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 20:32:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.techgenial.com/2007/06/are-phone-numbers-relevant.html/comment-page-1#comment-569</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 06:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/2007/06/are-phone-numbers-relevant.html#comment-569</guid>
		<description>Interesting thoughts. Personally, I don&#039;t think they *are* relevant anymore. Why should anyone have multiple means of contact? &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;For instance, to contact me (personally, not work or website) you could call my cell, my grand central number, my Gizmo id, my Skype id, my AIM, MSN, or Gtalk ids, or you could even email me. That&#039;s alot of connection points that no one knows all of them. So I&#039;m therefore unavailable to someone somehow at any given moment, when I might not want to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting thoughts. Personally, I don&#8217;t think they *are* relevant anymore. Why should anyone have multiple means of contact? </p>
<p>For instance, to contact me (personally, not work or website) you could call my cell, my grand central number, my Gizmo id, my Skype id, my AIM, MSN, or Gtalk ids, or you could even email me. That&#8217;s alot of connection points that no one knows all of them. So I&#8217;m therefore unavailable to someone somehow at any given moment, when I might not want to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.techgenial.com/2007/06/are-phone-numbers-relevant.html/comment-page-1#comment-10876</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 06:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/2007/06/are-phone-numbers-relevant.html#comment-10876</guid>
		<description>Interesting thoughts. Personally, I don&#039;t think they *are* relevant anymore. Why should anyone have multiple means of contact? For instance, to contact me (personally, not work or website) you could call my cell, my grand central number, my Gizmo id, my Skype id, my AIM, MSN, or Gtalk ids, or you could even email me. That&#039;s alot of connection points that no one knows all of them. So I&#039;m therefore unavailable to someone somehow at any given moment, when I might not want to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting thoughts. Personally, I don&#8217;t think they *are* relevant anymore. Why should anyone have multiple means of contact? For instance, to contact me (personally, not work or website) you could call my cell, my grand central number, my Gizmo id, my Skype id, my AIM, MSN, or Gtalk ids, or you could even email me. That&#8217;s alot of connection points that no one knows all of them. So I&#8217;m therefore unavailable to someone somehow at any given moment, when I might not want to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

