<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Presence and scheduled calls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techgenial.com/2007/10/presence-and-scheduled-calls.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techgenial.com/2007/10/presence-and-scheduled-calls.html</link>
	<description>Tech News, Social Media, Entrepreneurship</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 20:32:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: matt lambert</title>
		<link>http://www.techgenial.com/2007/10/presence-and-scheduled-calls.html/comment-page-1#comment-2513</link>
		<dc:creator>matt lambert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 19:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/2007/10/presence-and-scheduled-calls.html#comment-2513</guid>
		<description>Hi Luca. I agree that presence isn&#039;t right....in fact I think the availability concept is a step in the right direction, but really availability does depend on who YOU are, who is calling and why they are calling. Mix those three variables and you get another three -availability, scheduling, or a refusal to communicate :-)

http://www.conversationware.co.uk/presence-should-be-conditional.htm

Still a way to go then.

Regards Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Luca. I agree that presence isn&#8217;t right&#8230;.in fact I think the availability concept is a step in the right direction, but really availability does depend on who YOU are, who is calling and why they are calling. Mix those three variables and you get another three -availability, scheduling, or a refusal to communicate <img src='http://www.techgenial.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.conversationware.co.uk/presence-should-be-conditional.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.conversationware.co.uk/presence-should-be-conditional.htm</a></p>
<p>Still a way to go then.</p>
<p>Regards Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt lambert</title>
		<link>http://www.techgenial.com/2007/10/presence-and-scheduled-calls.html/comment-page-1#comment-11492</link>
		<dc:creator>matt lambert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 19:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/2007/10/presence-and-scheduled-calls.html#comment-11492</guid>
		<description>Hi Luca. I agree that presence isn&#039;t right....in fact I think the availability concept is a step in the right direction, but really availability does depend on who YOU are, who is calling and why they are calling. Mix those three variables and you get another three -availability, scheduling, or a refusal to communicate :-)

http://www.conversationware.co.uk/presence-should-be-conditional.htm

Still a way to go then.

Regards Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Luca. I agree that presence isn&#8217;t right&#8230;.in fact I think the availability concept is a step in the right direction, but really availability does depend on who YOU are, who is calling and why they are calling. Mix those three variables and you get another three -availability, scheduling, or a refusal to communicate <img src='http://www.techgenial.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.conversationware.co.uk/presence-should-be-conditional.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.conversationware.co.uk/presence-should-be-conditional.htm</a></p>
<p>Still a way to go then.</p>
<p>Regards Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

