Comments on: Adobe on Apple Aperture http://www.techgenial.com/2008/04/adobe-takes-on-apple-explicitly.html Tech News, Social Media, Entrepreneurship Thu, 17 May 2012 20:32:42 +0000 hourly 1 By: Landscape Photography and Nature Photography by Jim M. Goldstein - JMG-Galleries - Reader Question: Do you use Aperture or Lightroom? http://www.techgenial.com/2008/04/adobe-takes-on-apple-explicitly.html/comment-page-1#comment-5290 Landscape Photography and Nature Photography by Jim M. Goldstein - JMG-Galleries - Reader Question: Do you use Aperture or Lightroom? Fri, 11 Apr 2008 01:55:05 +0000 http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/?p=2155#comment-5290 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/2008/04/adobe-takes-on-apple-explicitly.html [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/2008/04/adobe-takes-on-apple-explicitly.html [...]

]]> By: Apple Aperture 2.1 Update, Adobe Lightroom 2 Beta http://www.techgenial.com/2008/04/adobe-takes-on-apple-explicitly.html/comment-page-1#comment-5253 Apple Aperture 2.1 Update, Adobe Lightroom 2 Beta Mon, 07 Apr 2008 06:53:36 +0000 http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/?p=2155#comment-5253 [...] market, Lightroom is Aperture’s main competitor, something that is more than evident in the press release announcing the download of the beta of Lightroom 2.0. Adobe does not preannounce products. However, the team is working on [...] [...] market, Lightroom is Aperture’s main competitor, something that is more than evident in the press release announcing the download of the beta of Lightroom 2.0. Adobe does not preannounce products. However, the team is working on [...]

]]> By: J http://www.techgenial.com/2008/04/adobe-takes-on-apple-explicitly.html/comment-page-1#comment-5164 J Thu, 03 Apr 2008 05:11:16 +0000 http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/?p=2155#comment-5164 Wasn't there an Aperture v1.5? Wasn’t there an Aperture v1.5?

]]> By: J http://www.techgenial.com/2008/04/adobe-takes-on-apple-explicitly.html/comment-page-1#comment-11708 J Thu, 03 Apr 2008 04:11:00 +0000 http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/?p=2155#comment-11708 Wasn't there an Aperture v1.5? Wasn’t there an Aperture v1.5?

]]> By: DB http://www.techgenial.com/2008/04/adobe-takes-on-apple-explicitly.html/comment-page-1#comment-5162 DB Thu, 03 Apr 2008 00:00:59 +0000 http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/?p=2155#comment-5162 Yea just ask where are the universal versions of acrobat reader, flash, shockwave, etc... are??? THey have been able to make universal binaries for atleast 2 years now and these products should have been one of the first and you would the most simplest to port. Shockwave 11 just got released Universally, the other day.....hopefully the others are close to release as well!! -DB Yea just ask where are the universal versions of acrobat reader, flash, shockwave, etc… are???

THey have been able to make universal binaries for atleast 2 years now and these products should have been one of the first and you would the most simplest to port.

Shockwave 11 just got released Universally, the other day…..hopefully the others are close to release as well!!

-DB

]]> By: DB http://www.techgenial.com/2008/04/adobe-takes-on-apple-explicitly.html/comment-page-1#comment-11716 DB Thu, 03 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/?p=2155#comment-11716 Yea just ask where are the universal versions of acrobat reader, flash, shockwave, etc... are??? THey have been able to make universal binaries for atleast 2 years now and these products should have been one of the first and you would the most simplest to port. Shockwave 11 just got released Universally, the other day.....hopefully the others are close to release as well!! -DB Yea just ask where are the universal versions of acrobat reader, flash, shockwave, etc… are???

THey have been able to make universal binaries for atleast 2 years now and these products should have been one of the first and you would the most simplest to port.

Shockwave 11 just got released Universally, the other day…..hopefully the others are close to release as well!!

-DB

]]> By: Steve http://www.techgenial.com/2008/04/adobe-takes-on-apple-explicitly.html/comment-page-1#comment-5157 Steve Wed, 02 Apr 2008 20:47:51 +0000 http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/?p=2155#comment-5157 Yes, everyone is aware of the speed issues with Aperture 1.x. Aperture 2.x is a much different (i.e. better) product. Lightroom was certainly off to a better start, but they're currently behind Aperture at the moment. Aperture 2.1's new plug-in architecture makes the product even more compelling as it reduces the need to go to Photoshop. Adobe seems to be afraid of cannibalizing it's own product line with this regard. Anyway, there are compelling reasons to use either product. I just wouldn't base my decision on perceived future updates, etc. One could easily take Adobe to task and ask them how long version 2 will be in beta. Version 1 was in beta seemingly forever. Clearly Aperture 2's release is forcing a response from Adobe. It should be clear which vendor is scrambling to catch up at this point. Yes, everyone is aware of the speed issues with Aperture 1.x. Aperture 2.x is a much different (i.e. better) product. Lightroom was certainly off to a better start, but they’re currently behind Aperture at the moment. Aperture 2.1′s new plug-in architecture makes the product even more compelling as it reduces the need to go to Photoshop. Adobe seems to be afraid of cannibalizing it’s own product line with this regard.

Anyway, there are compelling reasons to use either product. I just wouldn’t base my decision on perceived future updates, etc. One could easily take Adobe to task and ask them how long version 2 will be in beta. Version 1 was in beta seemingly forever. Clearly Aperture 2′s release is forcing a response from Adobe. It should be clear which vendor is scrambling to catch up at this point.

]]> By: Steve http://www.techgenial.com/2008/04/adobe-takes-on-apple-explicitly.html/comment-page-1#comment-11715 Steve Wed, 02 Apr 2008 20:47:00 +0000 http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/?p=2155#comment-11715 Yes, everyone is aware of the speed issues with Aperture 1.x. Aperture 2.x is a much different (i.e. better) product. Lightroom was certainly off to a better start, but they're currently behind Aperture at the moment. Aperture 2.1's new plug-in architecture makes the product even more compelling as it reduces the need to go to Photoshop. Adobe seems to be afraid of cannibalizing it's own product line with this regard. Anyway, there are compelling reasons to use either product. I just wouldn't base my decision on perceived future updates, etc. One could easily take Adobe to task and ask them how long version 2 will be in beta. Version 1 was in beta seemingly forever. Clearly Aperture 2's release is forcing a response from Adobe. It should be clear which vendor is scrambling to catch up at this point. Yes, everyone is aware of the speed issues with Aperture 1.x. Aperture 2.x is a much different (i.e. better) product. Lightroom was certainly off to a better start, but they’re currently behind Aperture at the moment. Aperture 2.1′s new plug-in architecture makes the product even more compelling as it reduces the need to go to Photoshop. Adobe seems to be afraid of cannibalizing it’s own product line with this regard.

Anyway, there are compelling reasons to use either product. I just wouldn’t base my decision on perceived future updates, etc. One could easily take Adobe to task and ask them how long version 2 will be in beta. Version 1 was in beta seemingly forever. Clearly Aperture 2′s release is forcing a response from Adobe. It should be clear which vendor is scrambling to catch up at this point.

]]> By: Luca Filigheddu http://www.techgenial.com/2008/04/adobe-takes-on-apple-explicitly.html/comment-page-1#comment-5152 Luca Filigheddu Wed, 02 Apr 2008 14:56:21 +0000 http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/?p=2155#comment-5152 I said it's ONE OF THE REASONS. It's clear that you make your choice according to what you need and what can REALLY offer you all the features you are looking for. In addition, there are also other components like speed and so on. Both apps are fantastic, I've been using Aperture for a while and what led me to switch to Lightroom is described here: http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/2007/12/aperture-or-lightroom.html I will give Aperture another try, but I am not willing to move from one to another continuously :-) In addition, I found great LR manuals from professional photographers, something more difficult to find (the good ones) for Aperture. I said it’s ONE OF THE REASONS. It’s clear that you make your choice according to what you need and what can REALLY offer you all the features you are looking for.

In addition, there are also other components like speed and so on. Both apps are fantastic, I’ve been using Aperture for a while and what led me to switch to Lightroom is described here: http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/2007/12/aperture-or-lightroom.html

I will give Aperture another try, but I am not willing to move from one to another continuously :-) In addition, I found great LR manuals from professional photographers, something more difficult to find (the good ones) for Aperture.

]]> By: Luca Filigheddu http://www.techgenial.com/2008/04/adobe-takes-on-apple-explicitly.html/comment-page-1#comment-11714 Luca Filigheddu Wed, 02 Apr 2008 14:56:00 +0000 http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/?p=2155#comment-11714 I said it's ONE OF THE REASONS. It's clear that you make your choice according to what you need and what can REALLY offer you all the features you are looking for. In addition, there are also other components like speed and so on. Both apps are fantastic, I've been using Aperture for a while and what led me to switch to Lightroom is described here: http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/2007/12/aperture-or-lightroom.html I will give Aperture another try, but I am not willing to move from one to another continuously :-) In addition, I found great LR manuals from professional photographers, something more difficult to find (the good ones) for Aperture. I said it’s ONE OF THE REASONS. It’s clear that you make your choice according to what you need and what can REALLY offer you all the features you are looking for.

In addition, there are also other components like speed and so on. Both apps are fantastic, I’ve been using Aperture for a while and what led me to switch to Lightroom is described here: http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/2007/12/aperture-or-lightroom.html

I will give Aperture another try, but I am not willing to move from one to another continuously :-) In addition, I found great LR manuals from professional photographers, something more difficult to find (the good ones) for Aperture.

]]>