Comments on: How Google Ranks Tweets: I Disagree http://www.techgenial.com/2010/01/how-google-ranks-tweets-i-disagree.html Tech News, Social Media, Entrepreneurship Thu, 17 May 2012 20:32:42 +0000 hourly 1 By: Mark Evans http://www.techgenial.com/2010/01/how-google-ranks-tweets-i-disagree.html/comment-page-1#comment-9980 Mark Evans Sat, 14 Aug 2010 11:38:00 +0000 http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/?p=4396#comment-9980 I agree. One of the flaws in Google's approach is people like myself who may have a lot of followers but don't follow a lot of people. How does Google take into account this kind of approach. As well, how does Google weigh things such as how often a tweet is retweeted, or how often a link is tweeted? To me, that's far more interesting and valid. Mark I agree. One of the flaws in Google’s approach is people like myself who may have a lot of followers but don’t follow a lot of people. How does Google take into account this kind of approach. As well, how does Google weigh things such as how often a tweet is retweeted, or how often a link is tweeted? To me, that’s far more interesting and valid.

Mark

]]> By: @steveplunkett http://www.techgenial.com/2010/01/how-google-ranks-tweets-i-disagree.html/comment-page-1#comment-9976 @steveplunkett Mon, 09 Aug 2010 19:49:29 +0000 http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/?p=4396#comment-9976 " Is Google not telling everything about how they rank tweets? "<br><br>absolutely not.. lol.. ” Is Google not telling everything about how they rank tweets? “

absolutely not.. lol..

]]> By: Sandrina http://www.techgenial.com/2010/01/how-google-ranks-tweets-i-disagree.html/comment-page-1#comment-9834 Sandrina Thu, 14 Jan 2010 19:32:56 +0000 http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/?p=4396#comment-9834 I agree that Twitterverse can become confusing when somebody is following 300-500 people. Twitterers who are actively involved in conversation and are being re-tweeted and commented a lot should have higher reputation. But Google's approach makes sense because starting assumption is that high reputation twitterers will follow only those worth attention. I agree that Twitterverse can become confusing when somebody is following 300-500 people. Twitterers who are actively involved in conversation and are being re-tweeted and commented a lot should have higher reputation. But Google's approach makes sense because starting assumption is that high reputation twitterers will follow only those worth attention.

]]> By: Sandrina http://www.techgenial.com/2010/01/how-google-ranks-tweets-i-disagree.html/comment-page-1#comment-9439 Sandrina Thu, 14 Jan 2010 11:32:56 +0000 http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/?p=4396#comment-9439 I agree that Twitterverse can become confusing when somebody is following 300-500 people. Twitterers who are actively involved in conversation and are being re-tweeted and commented a lot should have higher reputation. But Google's approach makes sense because starting assumption is that high reputation twitterers will follow only those worth attention. I agree that Twitterverse can become confusing when somebody is following 300-500 people. Twitterers who are actively involved in conversation and are being re-tweeted and commented a lot should have higher reputation. But Google's approach makes sense because starting assumption is that high reputation twitterers will follow only those worth attention.

]]> By: luca filigheddu http://www.techgenial.com/2010/01/how-google-ranks-tweets-i-disagree.html/comment-page-1#comment-9437 luca filigheddu Wed, 13 Jan 2010 13:09:06 +0000 http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/?p=4396#comment-9437 Ok, that makes sense, but I doubt they'll pay attention to my Tweets. You should know how messy Twitter can become, especially if you follow more than 300-500 people. It is very difficult to keep up on everything and unless users explicitly do something to endorse your content and show interest in it, the fact they are following me doesn't make much sense or increases my reputation. Ok, that makes sense, but I doubt they'll pay attention to my Tweets. You should know how messy Twitter can become, especially if you follow more than 300-500 people. It is very difficult to keep up on everything and unless users explicitly do something to endorse your content and show interest in it, the fact they are following me doesn't make much sense or increases my reputation.

]]> By: Alok Saboo http://www.techgenial.com/2010/01/how-google-ranks-tweets-i-disagree.html/comment-page-1#comment-9435 Alok Saboo Wed, 13 Jan 2010 13:02:44 +0000 http://www.lucafiligheddu.com/?p=4396#comment-9435 I do not completely disagree with what Google is doing. If you get followed by Techcrunch or Mashable (or the likes) it indicates that these heavyweights have found you worth of being followed. So even though they may not agree with everything you are saying, they find your opinions reasonable to be (at least) considered. Comments/thoughts? I do not completely disagree with what Google is doing. If you get followed by Techcrunch or Mashable (or the likes) it indicates that these heavyweights have found you worth of being followed. So even though they may not agree with everything you are saying, they find your opinions reasonable to be (at least) considered. Comments/thoughts?

]]>